Comparing the two articles

According to the first article "How to write an Academic Paper", it does a really good job in analyzing how papers are written in high school as to how papers are written at the college level. This article takes apart each important aspect of writing a quality academic paper and gives thorough information as what a student can do to impress his or her fellow readers (and what not to do of course). Audiencewise, this article does an excellent job to give firm and direct information to its readers. Hence probably the majority of the readers are freshmen in college, this article does a great job in analyzing what not to do and what to do with an academic paper and how to do so effeciently.

On the other hand, the second article does just the opposite. Yes, scientific reports are boring but to all the "nutty" professors in this world, such reports and outstanding and beyond interesting! Thus, this article is probably more or less than a satire on how to write another boring, scientific report. But this article tells the reader to not state a main point, hide important and much needed facts, etc, etc. In such case, such a type of paper. Such a paper is only stating facts and not paying attention to the main idea of analyzing any type of text with not just supporting your feelings, but using elements from the text to support/not support the analyses.